Search for:

A declarant may ask for a change to certain of the data elements in a customs declaration in accordance with Article 173 Union Customs Code (“UCC“), which is applicable to customs declarations that have already been accepted by customs. The Dutch Customs Authorities (“DCA“), however, apply a very strict application of Article 173 UCC, stating that amendments are only allowed if the amendments are required by customs legislation. This position taken by the DCA deviates from the practice of the tax authorities of other EU Member States, given the fact that Article 173 UCC does not stipulate that the amendments must be required by law.

The tide seems to have turned with the recent Guidance Document issued by the European Commission. Starting at page 50 of the Guidance Document, the European Commission clarifies how amendments to customs declarations based on Article 173 UCC should be made and in which circumstances such amendments may be made. It becomes clear from the Guidance Document that “any data element in the customs declaration may be amended if it can be proven that the amended data element corresponds to real facts at the moment when the customs declaration was accepted”. The Guidance Document does not provide for a condition that the amendments to a customs declaration must stem from a legal obligation to make such amendments.

The question now remains whether the DCA will change their view on the application of Article 173 UCC. It appears from internal communication of the DCA that they have been aware of the broader interpretation of Article 173 UCC since April 2022. This has thus far not resulted in the DCA applying a broader interpretation of Article 173 UCC.

We will continue monitoring whether the DCA will implement the broader interpretation of Article 173 UCC.

Author

Jennifer Revis is a partner in Baker McKenzie's London office and co-leads our EMEA Customs Team.
Jennifer focuses her practice on the public regulation of international trade, particularly in a wide range of customs compliance issues. She regularly advises clients on import matters, including customs valuation, rules of origin, and classification. She has worked with clients designing and implementing their compliance programs, policies, procedures and risk assessments, and assisting them in customs audits. She has significant experience in managing global customs projects and disputes, particularly in the area of customs valuation (transfer pricing; assists; royalties). Jennifer also advises on FTAs and trade remedies matters.
Jennifer has been consistently recognised as a "Leading Individual" for Customs & Excise and “Next Generation Partner” for Trade, WTO Anti-Dumping And Customs. Clients describe her as "an outstanding customs lawyer and litigator with fantastic experience. She is also easy to work with and leads her team with aplomb", "without a doubt, one of the best customs lawyers in the business (…) with an exceptionally deep knowledge of customs valuation concepts, as well as considerable experience applying those concepts in a variety of jurisdictions."
Jennifer has been on secondment to the UK customs authorities (Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs) in their tax and excise litigation department and to the Firm's European Law Centre in Brussels.

Author

Olof Johannesson is a member of Baker McKenzie’s International Commercial & Trade Group in Stockholm. Prior to joining the Firm in August 2017, he worked at other law firms in Gothenburg between 2015 and 2017, and in Brussels between 2014 and 2015.

Author

Alexandra Pasch is a Summer Associate in Baker McKenzie Washington, D.C. office.

Write A Comment