The Equality Act 2010 gives outsourced workers broad protections from discrimination by the client on whose contract they work. However, the Court of Appeal has held that the protection does not extend to the terms of the workers’ contracts of employment with the service provider, such as pay. The EAT had held that the protection could be engaged where the client had effectively dictated the terms on which the workers were employed, but the Court of Appeal has rejected that position. Companies with outsourced workforces can still be liable in many other respects, for example if they restrict access to onsite facilities or refuse to allow individuals to work on the contract on discriminatory grounds.

The UK will have a general election on 4 July 2024, which will decide who the next government will be. The political parties have been publishing their employment and HR-related proposals, which we summarize in this article. We have limited ourselves to Labour, the Conservatives, Reform, the Liberal Democrats and the Green Party, as the current top-polling parties fielding candidates throughout Great Britain.

As the UK’s Parliament has now been dissolved until the general election on 4 July 2024, most draft legislation will no longer proceed. However, some unfinished business is passed through agreement between the government and the opposition parties in what is known as the “wash up” process. These include laws on non-disclosure clauses, fair allocation of tips, additional paternity leave where the mother (or primary adopter) of a child dies, and the statutory code on fire and rehire.

Discussion of AI adoption in the workplace seems to have reached fever pitch in recent months – with good reason. In this article for IEL, we summarize the current legal framework and regulatory attitudes, and venture our insights into what employers can realistically do now to mitigate legal risk and put them in the best position with respect to future developments.