On 16 December 2025, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued two Notices addressing reporting obligations for tips and overtime under the Overtime and Bonus-Based Benefits Act (OBBBA).
The guidance provides transition relief for 2025, recognizing that employers and payors may not have updated systems or forms to comply with new requirements. It also explains how taxpayers can calculate deductions for tips and overtime when employer reporting is unavailable.
In addition, the notices signal future mandatory reporting obligations, indicating that structured compliance processes will be introduced in subsequent years.
On 10 December 2025, the IRS and Treasury announced forthcoming proposed regulations to address the sourcing of borrow fees in securities lending and sale-repurchase transactions. The proposed rules will source borrow fees to the residence of the recipient, generally exempting non-US securities lenders from US withholding tax.
The guidance applies to transactions documented under standard industry agreements and defines borrow fees broadly, including negative rebates, while excluding bespoke arrangements.
Taxpayers may rely on the Notice immediately, with the regulations applying prospectively to taxable years ending after publication in the Federal Register
In brief A recent case brought by the Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division’s Procurement Collusion Strike Force…
The Ninth Circuit dismissed antitrust claims against Las Vegas hotels and software provider Cendyn, ruling that independent use of algorithmic pricing tools doesn’t constitute unlawful price-fixing under the Sherman Act. The court found no coordinated conduct or restraint of trade, diverging from the DOJ’s broader interpretation. While businesses may adopt pricing algorithms, they must avoid collusion. The decision sets key boundaries for antitrust liability in the context of AI-driven pricing strategies.
Over the past week there have been two significant announcements by US Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and the US Department of the Treasury with respect to the filing of beneficial ownership information reports under the Corporate Transparency Act. Based on these announcements, foreign reporting companies should technically continue complying with the BOI requirements, though there will be no consequences for failing to do so until new regulations are issued. As to domestic reporting companies, there should not be any enforcement of the CTA against such companies or consequences if such companies fail to file BOI reports.
On 13 February 2025, the US Department of Justice Antitrust Division and the Federal Bureau of Investigation announced the launch of a new online portal to help track and arrest international fugitives believed to be evading prosecution for anticompetitive crimes by remaining abroad. Specifically, the portal features information on individuals who have been publicly charged with competition crimes but have not yet answered the charges in federal court. The portal currently provides identifying information for more than 70 international fugitives charged in connection with DOJ’s long-standing investigations into price fixing and bid rigging conspiracies related to automotive parts, fuel supply contracts to the US Department of Defense, air cargo, and international shipping, among others.
On September 27, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved final rules as part of technical amendments to EDGAR (collectively, referred to as “EDGAR Next”) to enhance the security of the system. The rulemaking amends Rule 10 and 11 of Regulation S-T, Form ID (needed to obtain EDGAR access codes) and updates the EDGAR Filer Manual.
EDGAR Next will significantly change how filers access EDGAR, make filings, and manage accounts.
The U.S. Supreme Court has denied appeals from both parties from the December 1, 2023, decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversing DOJ’s criminal conviction of a former executive of an aluminum products manufacturer for failure to state a per se antitrust offense under the Sherman Act. The Fourth Circuit held that the trial court erred in applying the per se rule without considering that the alleged scheme took place within the context of a “dual distribution” relationship among competing bidders, who also maintained a supplier relationship. The Fourth Circuit denied DOJ’s petition for an en banc rehearing.
On 7 November 2024, the FTC announced it will be sending refunds to 536,000 consumers deceived by Rejuvica’s and its owners’ unsupported claims that Sobrenix, a dietary supplement marketed and sold by Rejuvica, could reduce and eliminate alcohol cravings and consumption. In addition to the refunds, the FTC’s proposed order requests a permanent injunction and other relief due to violations under the FTC Act and the Opioid Addiction Recovery Fraud Prevention Act of 2018
Acting with other US regulators, the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) recently issued two consent orders (“CFTC Orders”) and filed a complaint (“CFTC Complaint”) alleging fraud and false, misleading, or inaccurate reports relating to voluntary carbon credits (“VCCs”). As noted by CFTC Director of Enforcement Ian McGinley, “[these actions] demonstrate [the CFTC’s] commitment to vigorously fight frauds in its markets, whether long-established or new and evolving, such as the carbon credit markets.” These are the first CFTC actions for fraud in the VCC market, and closely follow the CFTC’s recently published final Commission Guidance Regarding the Listing of Voluntary Carbon Credit Derivative Contracts (“Final Guidance”).