Search for:

In brief

A dismissal will be automatically unfair if the sole or principal reason for dismissal is that the employee took or sought to take parental leave. In Hilton Foods Solutions v. Wright, the EAT has decided that this protection does not require the employee to have made a formal request. Communications about taking parental leave might reach a stage that could be described as having sought to take the leave. This will be a question of fact for employment tribunals. The takeaway point is that communications about taking parental leave (or other types of family-related leave) should not be a factor in dismissing someone, or taking other detrimental action. A formal request to take leave does remain necessary in order to actually take the leave (unless a qualifying agreement says otherwise).  


Please get in touch if you have any questions concerning this case.

Author

Stephen Ratcliffe is a partner in Baker McKenzie's Employment and Compensation practice in London in which he has worked for over 20 years. He advises on the full range of contentious and non-contentious employment law matters for which he has been ranked for multiple years in Chambers & Partners. He is also a member of the Legislative & Policy Committee of the Employment Lawyers Association, and a member of the Employment Consulting Editorial Board of Lexis+. In addition to his day to day practice, Stephen is the London Office's Training Principal and co-Chairs the London BakerWomen group.

Author

Annabel Mackay has extensive experience of advising employers and employees on a range of complex employment issues.
She has been ranked in Legal 500 and Chambers & Partners since 2015.
Chambers & Partners 2024 report that Annabel "draws praise for her work on behalf of financial sector clients and large corporates." An employer client notes that "she navigates her way through complex legislation and case law to give us new perspectives and initiatives."

Author

James Brown is a Knowledge Lawyer in Baker McKenzie, London office.