Search for:

In brief

On 28 January 2026, the Health Sciences Authority (HSA) issued Version 3 of its product defect reporting and recall procedures for therapeutic products (TPs) and cell, tissue and gene therapy products (CTGTPs). The HSA, through the updated guidance, does the following:

  • Provides some clarification on the scope of product recalls and reportable defects
  • Clarifies and reorganises certain portions of the guidance
  • Highlights certain key issues to take note of
  • Creates a new product defect reporting form for defects relating to clinical research materials used in clinical trials
  • Expands the annexures substantially

In more detail

Clarifications on the scope of product recalls and reportable defects

The HSA has made several clarifications on the scope of the guidance, particularly the following:

  • The definition of “recall” now expressly excludes the retrieval of expired products not due to product defects and the retrieval of a small quantity of products for investigative purposes.
  • Out of specification (OOS) results related to stability commitment batches from previous variation applications are now expressly listed as an example of a reportable defect.

Clarifications and reorganisation of the guidance on investigations and risk assessments

The HSA previously included a list of information and actions that are required in the investigation report during the risk assessment. It has now expanded the “Investigation and risk assessment” section to include specific guidance on the components of the investigation, considerations of the risk assessment, what to include in the investigation report, explanations on the distribution and supply information.

Reiteration of the proper product defect reporting procedure

The HSA has emphasised that, while minor variation (MIV) applications may be required as part of the CAPA, they do not substitute the need to first notify the HSA of the defect via the product defect reporting form.

New product defect reporting form for clinical research materials used in clinical trials

The HSA has also provided a link to a new product defect reporting form for applicants and clinical trial sponsors to report defects.

Updated annexures

Finally, the HSA has also considerably supplemented its annexures by including the following information:

  • Under Annex II, the HSA elaborates on the requirements for supplying an OOS batch of CTGTP, also adding a new subsection on the scope of applicability while reorganising previous content under clearer subheadings.
  • Under Annex III, the HSA consolidates guidance on recommended contents for Dear Purchaser Letters and Dear Healthcare Professional Letters with expanded elaborations.

Under Annex V, the HSA consolidates guidance on consumer-level recalls, mandating notifying the HSA immediately upon deciding to initiate a consumer-level recall. This is justified on the basis that these recalls typically require additional preparation, coordination and regulatory oversight.

Key takeaways

The updated guidance provides clear and structured guidance regarding the entire product defect reporting, investigation, risk assessment, corrective and preventive actions (CAPA), and recall process for TPs and CTGTPs. It is likely that the HSA has refined its guidance on product defect reporting and recall based on deficiencies from past product registrants and dealers in such situations. Product registrants and dealers should familiarise themselves with the updated product defect reporting and recall procedures to ensure compliance with applicable requirements.

* * * * *

Author

Andy Leck is a distinguished senior legal practitioner in Intellectual Property and Technology, Media and Telecommunications (TMT) matters. He is the head of the Intellectual Property and Technology (IPTech) Practice Group in Singapore, and serves as the Asia Pacific head of Baker McKenzie's TMT Industry Group. Andy is widely recognized by reputable global industry and legal publications as a leader in his field. He was named on "The A-List: Singapore's Top 100 lawyers" by Asia Business Law Journal since 2018. Chambers Asia Pacific notes that Andy as "a well-known IP practitioner who is highlighted for his record of handling major trade mark litigation, as well as commercial exploitation of IP rights in the media and technology sectors. He's been in the industry for a long time and has always been held in high regard. He is known to be very fair and is someone you would like to be in the trenches with you during negotiations." Furthermore, Asian Legal Business acknowledges Andy as a leading practitioner in his field and notes that he “always gives good, quick advice, [is] client-focused and has strong technical knowledge for his areas of practice.” Under his leadership, the TMT team in Singapore is highly regarded for its expertise in “outsourcing, cloud computing and TMT IP-related mandates” and “data privacy, compliance, technology and telecoms regulations.” Andy was appointed by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) as an IP Adjudicator to hear IP disputes between 2021 and 2023. He has been an appointed member of the Singapore Copyright Tribunal since May 2010 and a mediator with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center, as well as the Singapore Mediation Centre.

Author

Ren Jun Lim is a principal with Baker McKenzie Wong & Leow. He represents local and international clients in both contentious and non-contentious intellectual property matters. He also advises on a full range of healthcare, as well as consumer goods-related legal and regulatory issues. Ren Jun co-leads Baker McKenzie Wong & Leow's Healthcare as well as Consumer Goods & Retail industry groups. He sits on the Law Society of Singapore IP Committee and on the Executive Committee of the Association of Information Security Professionals. He is also a member of the Vaccines Working Group, Singapore Association of Pharmaceutical Industries, a member of the International Trademark Association, as well as a member of the Regulatory Affairs Professionals Association. Ren Jun is ranked in the Silver tier for Individuals: Enforcement and Litigation and Individuals: Prosecution and Strategy, and a recommended lawyer for Individuals: Transactions by WTR 1000, 2020. He is also listed in Asia IP's Best 50 IP Expert, 2020, recognised as a Rising Star by Managing IP: IP Stars, 2019 and one of Singapore's 70 most influential lawyers aged 40 and under by Singapore Business Review, 2016. Ren Jun was acknowledged by WTR 1000 as a "trademark connoisseur who boasts supplementary knowledge of regulatory issues in the consumer products industry." He was also commended by clients for being "very responsive to enquiries and with a keen eye for detail, he is extremely hands-on. His meticulous and in-depth approach to strategising is key to the excellent outcomes we enjoy."