Search for:
Author

Andy Leck

Browsing
Andy Leck is the head of the Intellectual Property and Technology (IPTech) Practice Group and a member of the Dispute Resolution Practice Group in Singapore. He is a core member of Baker McKenzie's regional IP practice and also leads the Myanmar IP Practice Group. Andy is recognised by reputable global industry and legal publications as a leader in his field. He was named on "The A-List: Singapore's Top 100 lawyers" by Asia Business Law Journal 2018. In addition, Chambers Asia Pacific notes that Andy is "a well-known IP practitioner who is highlighted for his record of handling major trade mark litigation, as well as commercial exploitation of IP rights in the media and technology sectors. He's been in the industry for a long time and has always been held in high regard. He is known to be very fair and is someone you would like to be in the trenches with you during negotiations." Furthermore, Asian Legal Business acknowledges Andy as a leading practitioner in his field and notes that he “always gives good, quick advice, [is] client-focused and has strong technical knowledge for his areas of practice.” Andy was appointed by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) as an IP Adjudicator to hear disputes at IPOS for a two-year term from April 2021. He has been an appointed member of the Singapore Copyright Tribunal since May 2010 and a mediator with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center. He is also appointed as a Notary Public & Commissioner for Oaths in Singapore. He previously served on the International Trademark Association’s Board of Directors and was a member of the executive committee.

In a recent article, The Cybersecurity of Gen-AI and LLMs: Current Issues and Concerns, the Cyber Security Agency of Singapore provides helpful commentary on the security and privacy challenges associated with generative artificial intelligence and large language models. The article outlines issues such as accidental data leaks, vulnerabilities in AI-generated code and potential misuse of AI by malicious actors, before providing recommendations on the steps that technology companies can take to address these concerns.

In brief
The regulations relating to patent linkage in the Health Products (Therapeutic Products) Regulations (“Regulations”) were recently amended through the Health Products (Therapeutic Products) (Amendment) Regulations 2024. The amendments came into force on 1 August 2024.

The changes aim to clarify for stakeholders which patents need to be considered when applying to register a therapeutic product and which patents fall under the patent declaration regulations. Additionally, they seek to reduce the potential for indiscriminate use of the patent declaration process.

Key takeaways
The amended patent declaration requirements aim to reduce potential patent disputes before the Health Sciences Authority (“HSA”) grants registration for therapeutic products. To achieve this, HSA will notify patent owners about the registration of products covered by a patent during its term without their consent or agreement. In particular, it is now clear that process patents do not fall within Regulation 23 of the Regulations.
Anyone who makes a false patent declaration when applying to register a therapeutic product, such as: (a) by making any statement or furnishing any document which the person knows or has reason to believe is false in a material particular; or (b) by intentionally suppressing any material fact, and furnishing information that is misleading, shall be guilty of an offense and liable on conviction to a fine of up to SGD 20,000 (approx. USD 15,500) and/or imprisonment for up to 12 months.
In more detail
Under Regulation 23 of the Regulations, the HSA is required to consider whether a patent is in force in respect of a therapeutic product that is sought to be registered. Therapeutic product applicants must, at the time of their application, furnish to HSA a patent declaration stating whether any patent is in force in respect of the relevant product and whether the applicant is the proprietor of the patent. Where the applicant is not the proprietor of the patent, the applicant must declare that:

the patentee has consented to or has acquiesced in the grant of the registration;
the patent is invalid; or
the patent will not be infringed by acts relating to the therapeutic product.
Following feedback received that the existing regulations lack clarity and create uncertainty as to the requirements for patent declarations, and following a public consultation held from 1 to 31 March 2024, HSA’s amendments to the Regulations specify that the following patent declarations must be furnished to HSA during registration of therapeutic products (see our previous client alert here):

A patent containing a claim for an active ingredient of that therapeutic product
A patent containing a claim for a formulation or composition of that therapeutic product
A patent containing a claim for the use of an active ingredient in the manufacture of that therapeutic product for a specific therapeutic, preventive, palliative or diagnostic use
The amendments also clarified that the patent declaration requirement does not apply to the following patents:

A process patent, other than a process patent that contains a claim for the use of an active ingredient in the manufacture of a therapeutic product for a specific therapeutic, preventive, palliative or diagnostic use
A patent that contains only claims relating to packaging
A patent that contains only claims relating to metabolites
A patent that contains only claims relating to intermediates
HSA further clarified that the types of patents that are subject to the requirements under Regulation 23 include the following:

A patent that contains a mixture of claims specified in Regulation 23(1)(a) and claims specified in Regulation 23(11), e.g., a patent containing claims for both an active ingredient of that therapeutic product and its metabolites
A patent containing a claim for the same polymorphic form of an active ingredient of that therapeutic product
Applicants must declare any subsisting restraining patent in relation to the therapeutic product for which registration is sought at the time of application and as required by HSA. HSA will then process registration applications based on the declared application category in the patent declaration form.

* * * * *

LOGO_Wong&Leow_Singapore

© 2024 Baker & McKenzie.Wong & Leow. All rights reserved. Baker & McKenzie.Wong & Leow is incorporated with limited liability and is a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International, a global law firm with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a “principal” means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an “office” means an office of any such law firm. This may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

The Cyber Security Agency (CSA) has just released Guidelines on Securing AI Systems (“Guidelines”) and a Companion Guide on Securing AI Systems (“Companion Guide”).
The Guidelines advocate for a “secure by design” and “secure by default” approach, addressing both existing cybersecurity threats and emerging risks, such as adversarial machine learning. The aim is to provide system owners with principles for raising awareness and implementing security controls throughout the AI lifecycle.
The Companion Guide is an open-collaboration resource, and while not mandatory, it offers guidance on useful measures and controls informed by industry best practices, academic insights and resources such as the MITRE ATLAS database and OWASP Top 10 for Machine Learning and Generative AI.

In June 2024, the Health Sciences Authority (HSA) participated in multi-agency enforcement operations with various statutory boards to clamp down on illegal cross-border activities, including the import of illegal health products. On 25 June 2024, in a joint news release with the Singapore Police Force, Immigration & Checkpoints Authority, Central Narcotics Bureau, Singapore Customs, and National Parks Board, the HSA announced that multi-agency enforcement operations were carried out at Singapore Changi Airport. These enforcement operations were part of the authorities’ efforts to clamp down on illegal cross-border activities.

On 8 June 2024, the Electric Vehicles Charging (Licensing) (Amendment) Regulations 2024 (“Amendments”) came into operation. The Amendments introduce a new Regulation 4A into the Electric Vehicles Charging (Licensing) Regulations 2023 (“Regulations”), which prescribes the types of insurance Electric Vehicle Charging Operators (EVCOs) must have and maintain before EVCOs can be granted a licence to provide EV charging services in Singapore or operate an EV charging station under Sections 45(2)(f) and 45(3) of the Electric Vehicles Charging Act 2022.

Following the publication of the proposed Framework in January 2024 and the feedback received from various stakeholders, the finalized Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AI was released on 30 May 2024 by the Infocommunications Media Development Authority (IMDA) and AI Verify Foundation. The Framework expands upon the Model AI Governance Framework last updated in 2020.

On 21 June 2024, the Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCCS) issued a warning to a furniture retailer for publishing fake five-star product reviews on its website. Upon receiving complaints from customers, the CCCS launched an investigation and concluded that the retailer and two of its related companies posted the reviews. This constituted an unfair practice under the Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act 2003 (CPFTA).