Search for:
Category

North America

Category
In Cybersecurity, Data and Tech

United States: Internet across borders — What law governs?

by 1 Min Read

Via the Internet, companies can publish information, offer contracts, deliver virtual items, and send payments to any country in the world. Companies can also collect personal information from consumers anywhere on the planet. For attorneys, this raises the question of what law governs transactions and activities involving businesses or legal entities in more than one jurisdiction. In this article, we summarize a few principles, flag commonly relevant issues, and suggest practical approaches for attorneys advising Internet businesses.

Read More
In AML & Financial Services Regulatory

United States: The GENIUS Act — A new federal framework for stablecoin issuers, custodians, and banks

by , , , and 9 Mins Read

On July 18, 2025, President Trump signed into law the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act), marking a pivotal moment in the evolution of digital asset regulation. As the first comprehensive federal framework governing payment stablecoins, the GENIUS Act introduces a robust regulatory regime designed to enhance market integrity and consumer protection. The GENIUS Act will take effect on the earlier of (i) January 18, 2027 (i.e., 18 months following enactment) or (ii) 120 days following the issuance of final implementing regulations. This relatively short compliance runway underscores the urgency for stakeholders to begin preparing now.

In Tax

United States: The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) changes the capitalized interest rules under section 163(j)

by 1 Min Read

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act makes three major changes to the interest deduction limitation provision of §163(j). Pub. L. No. 119-21, §70303, §70341 (July 4, 2025), applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024. This article reviews the three changes and then focuses on the new rule for capitalized interest.

Read More
In AML & Financial Services Regulatory

United States: Digital asset/blockchain industry implications of the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) and other emerging federal legislation

by and 7 Mins Read

On July 4, 2025, the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act was signed into law, making important changes to the Internal Revenue Code. The Act has implications for US and non-US companies and their domestic and international transactions, capital investment, and research and development activities, amongst other areas, which carry significant weight for the cryptocurrency/digital asset industry. From cryptocurrency exchanges, payment processors, asset managers and cryptocurrency funds to mining companies, token issuers, custodians, and centralized or decentralized lending platforms, the Act’s provisions reshape the tax landscape in ways that demand close attention.

In AML & Financial Services Regulatory

United States: Blowing the Whistle on Collusion – New DOJ Antitrust Division Program

by , , and 4 Mins Read

The Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division, in partnership with the U.S. Postal Service, has launched a Whistleblower Rewards Program to combat antitrust crimes. Following the DOJ Criminal Division’s launch of a whistleblower pilot program last year,1 the Antitrust Division is now offering a reward to whistleblowers. Under the new program, individuals who report credible and timely evidence of antitrust collusion—such as price-fixing or bid-rigging and certain monopolization cases—may receive up to 30% of recovered criminal fines. This marks a significant step in expanding detection tools for antitrust violations, with reports to be submitted through a dedicated DOJ webpage.

In ESG

Annual Compliance Conference summary: Supply chains – Navigating ESG and Trade-related Risks

by , , , and 1 Min Read

At the Annual Compliance conference recently held in London, the session on ‘Supply chains – Navigating ESG and Trade-related Risks’ examined the intensifying ESG and trade-related risks facing global supply chains, shaped by shifting political priorities and evolving regulatory frameworks.

Read More
In Anti-Corruption

Annual Compliance Conference summary: US and UK Enforcement in the Current Climate – Strategic Shifts and Global Implications

by , , and 4 Mins Read

At the Annual Compliance conference recently held in London, the session on ‘US and UK Enforcement in the Current Climate: Strategic Shifts and Global Implications’ explored the evolving enforcement landscape across the UK, US, and Latin America, with a particular focus on strategic priorities, inter-agency cooperation, and the practical implications of recent policy shifts.

In AML & Financial Services Regulatory

United States: SEC reconsiders foreign private issuer framework

by , , , and 2 Mins Read

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently published a concept release seeking public comment on redefining the term “foreign private issuer” (FPI). The current framework provides FPIs with less regulation than domestic issuers, based on the understanding that FPIs face different circumstances, such as compliance with home country laws. However, a recent study revealed significant changes in the FPI population, including an increase in China-based issuers incorporated in lightly regulated tax havens. The SEC is concerned that the current FPI definition may no longer be suitable and is considering potential amendments.

In Anti-Corruption

United States: America first — A recasting of DOJ FCPA enforcement policy in the name of national security

by , , , , , , , and 8 Mins Read

The new DOJ FCPA enforcement policy emphasizes US national security and business interests, moving away from solely prosecuting bribery of foreign officials. The focus will be on bribes involving Transnational Criminal Organizations (TCOs), cartels, and those impacting US competitiveness or national security. Routine, locally accepted business practices are deprioritized. The DOJ will exercise discretion to determine if conduct genuinely impacts US interests, leaving other cases to the SEC or foreign regulators. This creates a more nuanced and unpredictable enforcement environment, with clarity expected only as enforcement patterns emerge.

Read More
Load More