The European Supervisory Authorities report steady improvement in principal adverse impact (PAI) disclosures under the SFDR, especially among larger financial groups. However, disclosures often lack quantifiable actions, and “non-consideration” statements remain generic. The ESAs recommend clearer, shorter, and machine-readable disclosures, more proportional requirements, and less frequent reporting to enhance quality and relevance. Further regulatory guidance may follow to address persistent shortcomings.

Companies are navigating a shifting ESG and sustainability regulatory landscape across Europe and the US. The session opened with an overview of deregulatory trends in Europe, including the Omnibus package, evolving CSRD and CSDDD obligations, and the EU Deforestation Regulation. In contrast, the US discussion highlighted the rise of the anti-ESG movement at the federal level, set against California’s continued push for climate disclosure laws impacting both public and private companies.

On 26 February 2025, the European Commission adopted the Omnibus Simplification Package, aimed at reducing regulatory burdens related to sustainability reporting for European companies. This initiative amends several key directives, including the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive and the EU Taxonomy Regulation.
These proposals aim to streamline reporting obligations, enhance competitiveness and adjust the scope and timelines of existing regulations.