Search for:

In brief

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) introduced the Maintenance of Racial Harmony Bill (“Bill“) and the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore (Amendment) Bill in Parliament for First Reading on 7 January 2025.

The Bill introduces specific legislation on racial harmony and consolidates the government’s existing powers to deal with racial issues and threats to racial harmony, including a Restraining Order (RO) regime to deal with content prejudicial to racial harmony.


In more detail

Background

The Bill takes close reference from the existing Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act (MRHA) and the Penal Code.

The key proposals in the Bill are closely aligned with those in the MRHA and include the introduction of the following: (1) an RO regime to target content prejudicial to racial harmony in Singapore; (2) a community-based approach to managing racial incidents; and (3) safeguards to prevent designated race-based entities from being used as vectors of foreign influence.

The Bill also consolidates Penal Code offences relating to race (e.g. inciting feelings of enmity, hatred, ill-will or hostility against a racial group; inciting violence on the basis of race, or against a racial group). The Bill will also contain provisions that apply even if the offending conduct occurs or threats originate from overseas (e.g. via social media), as long as the offence was directed towards a person or group in Singapore.

Restriction orders

Similar to the existing RO scheme under the MRHA, the proposed Bill enables the Minister of Home Affairs to issue ROs against persons involved in the communication, production or distribution of content that prejudices the maintenance of religious harmony in Singapore.

A racial content RO under the Bill may do the following:

  1. Prohibit a person from communicating or distributing specified information or material;
  2. Prohibit a person from addressing a specified audience on a specified subject;
  3. Require a person to take all reasonably practicable steps to ensure that any specified information or material is no longer available to the general public in Singapore;
  4. Prohibit a person from printing, editing, assisting, or contributing to a specified publication; and
  5. Prohibit a person from holding office in an editorial board or a committee of a specified publication.

The RO takes immediate effect once issued. There will be safeguards in place for the issuance of ROs — all ROs will be reviewed by the new Presidential Council for Racial and Religious Harmony (PCRRH) (replacing the Presidential Council for Religious Harmony established under the MRHA) and are subject to confirmation by the President. Persons issued an RO will also be able to make representations to the PCRRH.

Safeguards against foreign influence

The Bill also introduces safeguards against external actors exerting malicious foreign influence to undermine racial harmony.

The safeguards will apply to designated race-based entities. An entity may be designated if the Competent Authority is satisfied that:

  1. Its primary or other objects, purposes or activities includes representing or promoting the interests of, or discussing any issue relating to, any race; and
  2. Designation is deemed necessary or expedient to pre-empt, prevent or reduce any foreign influence that may undermine racial harmony in Singapore.

Examples of designated entities include clan and business associations linked to the Chinese, Malay and Indian races.

These entities will be notified of the Competent Authority’s intent to designate them, and can submit representations as to why they need not be designated before a final decision is reached. Designated race-based entities may also apply to the Minister for Home Affairs for exemptions from some or all obligations under the Bill.

Designated race-based entities will be subject to reporting and governance obligations, including the following:

  • Requirements to disclose: (i) foreign and anonymous donations accepted; (ii) foreign affiliations; and (iii) their leadership composition
  • Requirements to comply with leadership restrictions, to ensure that: (i) more than half of the entity’s governing body comprises of Singapore citizens; and (ii) the responsible officers of the entity are Singapore citizens or permanent residents

The Minister for Home Affairs will also have powers to impose stepped-up measures against specific race-based entities through the issuance of foreign influence ROs. Such ROs can:

  1. Prohibit an entity from accepting donations from a specified foreign principal, or any anonymous donation;
  2. Require an entity to return or dispose of any donation from a specified foreign principal, or any anonymous donation;
  3. Prohibit an entity from forming or maintaining an affiliation with a foreign principal; and/or
  4. Prohibit an entity from appointing or retaining any individual as a member of its governing body.

Key takeaways

The Bill is part of the MHA’s and the government’s broader efforts to strengthen racial cohesion and promote racial harmony in Singapore.

Further information is available on the MHA’s website.

For further information and to discuss what this development might mean for you, please get in touch with your usual Baker McKenzie contact.

* * * * *

LOGO_Wong&Leow_Singapore

© 2025 Baker & McKenzie. Wong & Leow. All rights reserved. Baker & McKenzie. Wong & Leow is incorporated with limited liability and is a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International, a global law firm with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a “principal” means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an “office” means an office of any such law firm. This may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Author

Ken Chia is a member of the Firm’s IP Tech, International Commercial & Trade and Competition Practice Groups. He is regularly ranked as a leading TMT and competition lawyer by top legal directories, including Chambers Asia Pacific and Legal 500 Asia Pacific. Ken is an IAPP Certified International Privacy Professional (FIP, CIPP(A), CIPT, CIPM) and a fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and the Singapore Institute of Arbitrators.

Author

Andy Leck is the head of the Intellectual Property and Technology (IPTech) Practice Group and a member of the Dispute Resolution Practice Group in Singapore. He is a core member of Baker McKenzie's regional IP practice and also leads the Myanmar IP Practice Group. Andy is recognised by reputable global industry and legal publications as a leader in his field. He was named on "The A-List: Singapore's Top 100 lawyers" by Asia Business Law Journal 2018. In addition, Chambers Asia Pacific notes that Andy is "a well-known IP practitioner who is highlighted for his record of handling major trade mark litigation, as well as commercial exploitation of IP rights in the media and technology sectors. He's been in the industry for a long time and has always been held in high regard. He is known to be very fair and is someone you would like to be in the trenches with you during negotiations." Furthermore, Asian Legal Business acknowledges Andy as a leading practitioner in his field and notes that he “always gives good, quick advice, [is] client-focused and has strong technical knowledge for his areas of practice.” Andy was appointed by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) as an IP Adjudicator to hear disputes at IPOS for a two-year term from April 2021. He has been an appointed member of the Singapore Copyright Tribunal since May 2010 and a mediator with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center. He is also appointed as a Notary Public & Commissioner for Oaths in Singapore. He previously served on the International Trademark Association’s Board of Directors and was a member of the executive committee.

Author

Ren Jun Lim is a principal with Baker McKenzie Wong & Leow. He represents local and international clients in both contentious and non-contentious intellectual property matters. He also advises on a full range of healthcare, as well as consumer goods-related legal and regulatory issues. Ren Jun co-leads Baker McKenzie Wong & Leow's Healthcare as well as Consumer Goods & Retail industry groups. He sits on the Law Society of Singapore IP Committee and on the Executive Committee of the Association of Information Security Professionals. He is also a member of the Vaccines Working Group, Singapore Association of Pharmaceutical Industries, a member of the International Trademark Association, as well as a member of the Regulatory Affairs Professionals Association. Ren Jun is ranked in the Silver tier for Individuals: Enforcement and Litigation and Individuals: Prosecution and Strategy, and a recommended lawyer for Individuals: Transactions by WTR 1000, 2020. He is also listed in Asia IP's Best 50 IP Expert, 2020, recognised as a Rising Star by Managing IP: IP Stars, 2019 and one of Singapore's 70 most influential lawyers aged 40 and under by Singapore Business Review, 2016. Ren Jun was acknowledged by WTR 1000 as a "trademark connoisseur who boasts supplementary knowledge of regulatory issues in the consumer products industry." He was also commended by clients for being "very responsive to enquiries and with a keen eye for detail, he is extremely hands-on. His meticulous and in-depth approach to strategising is key to the excellent outcomes we enjoy."

Author

Sanil is a local principal in the Intellectual Property & Technology Practice Group in Baker McKenzie Wong & Leow. Sanil is qualified in both Singapore and Australia, and is a Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP/A) by the International Association of Privacy Professionals. Sanil is recognized as a Rising Star by both Legal 500 Asia Pacific in the Intellectual Property: Local Firms category as well as by IP Stars for his advisory work in the IP space. Sanil is also recommended by World Trademark Review 1000 for IP enforcement, litigation, prosecution and strategy.

Author

Daryl Seetoh is a local principal in the Intellectual Property & Technology (IPTech) practice group at Baker McKenzie Wong & Leow. He is a qualified lawyer in Singapore, and is a member of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) as a Certified Information Privacy Professional for Asia (CIPP/Asia), an IAPP Certified Information Privacy Manager (CIPM) and a Certified Information Privacy Professional for Europe (CIPP/E). Daryl has previously worked at Baker McKenzie’s San Francisco office and has also been seconded to financial institution and technology multinational clients.