Singapore is considering age assurance measures for social media platforms to protect younger users online. These may include age verification systems to ensure age-appropriate content. The Online Safety Bill will be tabled soon, and a new commission to support victims of online harm is planned for next year. This aligns with global efforts to enhance digital safety for children.
The Ninth Circuit dismissed antitrust claims against Las Vegas hotels and software provider Cendyn, ruling that independent use of algorithmic pricing tools doesn’t constitute unlawful price-fixing under the Sherman Act. The court found no coordinated conduct or restraint of trade, diverging from the DOJ’s broader interpretation. While businesses may adopt pricing algorithms, they must avoid collusion. The decision sets key boundaries for antitrust liability in the context of AI-driven pricing strategies.
Colombia’s Law 2502 of 2025 adds an aggravating factor to identity theft committed using AI, increasing penalties and formally recognizing deepfakes. It mandates traceability systems and coordinated public policy to address AI-related crimes. The law also strengthens biometric data protections, requiring explicit consent and strict processing safeguards. Implementation begins July 2026, reflecting Colombia’s commitment to digital ethics and cybersecurity.
Via the Internet, companies can publish information, offer contracts, deliver virtual items, and send payments to any country in the world. Companies can also collect personal information from consumers anywhere on the planet. For attorneys, this raises the question of what law governs transactions and activities involving businesses or legal entities in more than one jurisdiction. In this article, we summarize a few principles, flag commonly relevant issues, and suggest practical approaches for attorneys advising Internet businesses.
Malaysia currently lacks a dedicated legal framework to effectively address the increasing scale and sophistication of spam-related activities, which have seen a nearly 200% surge in reported complaints between 2021 and 2025. In response, the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) is proposing a regulatory framework for Unsolicited Commercial Electronic Messages, commonly referred to as spam. On 13 August 2025, MCMC issued a public consultation paper inviting feedback on the proposed framework.
2 August 2025 was an important deadline under the EU AI Act: obligations for providers of general-purpose AI (GPAI) models entered into force, provided the model is placed on the market on or after this date. The European Commission and EU AI Office have been gearing up for this deadline with recently released Guidelines for providers of general-purpose AI models (the Guidelines) and a final General-Purpose AI Code of Practice (the Code). The Code was subject to the Commission and the AI Board assessing its adequacy. The Commission confirmed the Code’s formal approval on 1 August. The Guidelines provide an interpretative framework for understanding the obligations of providers of general-purpose AI models, and the Code offers specific measures suggested by the Commission that providers can implement to demonstrate that they meet these obligations.
Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) has rolled out amendments to its Data Protection Law that came into effect in July 2025 following a consultation earlier in the year. The updates bring the law into greater alignment with the GDPR’s approach to enforcement, providing additional protections for data subjects.
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs of the European Parliament recently published a draft report on digitalisation, AI and algorithmic management in the workplace. It makes a number of recommendations including for a directive specifically regulating ‘algorithmic management’ in the workplace with protections extending to self-employed individuals in addition to workers. There are a number of steps in the EU legislative process before these proposals could become legally binding. Given their significance, including the broad definition of ‘algorithmic management’, impacted organisations should nevertheless monitor if and how they develop.
On July 18, 2025, President Trump signed into law the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act), marking a pivotal moment in the evolution of digital asset regulation. As the first comprehensive federal framework governing payment stablecoins, the GENIUS Act introduces a robust regulatory regime designed to enhance market integrity and consumer protection. The GENIUS Act will take effect on the earlier of (i) January 18, 2027 (i.e., 18 months following enactment) or (ii) 120 days following the issuance of final implementing regulations. This relatively short compliance runway underscores the urgency for stakeholders to begin preparing now.
On July 4, 2025, the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act was signed into law, making important changes to the Internal Revenue Code. The Act has implications for US and non-US companies and their domestic and international transactions, capital investment, and research and development activities, amongst other areas, which carry significant weight for the cryptocurrency/digital asset industry. From cryptocurrency exchanges, payment processors, asset managers and cryptocurrency funds to mining companies, token issuers, custodians, and centralized or decentralized lending platforms, the Act’s provisions reshape the tax landscape in ways that demand close attention.