Search for:

In brief

The Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) and AI Verify Foundation have announced the draft Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AI (“Framework“), which adopts a systematic and balanced approach to addressing concerns posed by generative AI (GenAI) while continuing to facilitate innovation.

The Framework expands on the Model AI Governance Framework that covered traditional AI, which was last updated in 2020.


In more detail

Nine dimensions to foster a trusted ecosystem

The Framework proposes nine dimensions to be considered together to foster a trusted AI ecosystem, namely:

  1. Accountability — Incentivising players along the AI development chain to be responsible for the protection of end users. This requires the allocation of responsibility based on the level of control that each player has in the development chain.
  2. Data — Good quality data is key for the development of GenAI. However, it is also crucial to consider how such a need intersects with data protection laws, copyright laws and data governance.
  3. Trusted development and deployment — Best practices should be adopted to ensure meaningful transparency around model development and the implementation of baseline safety and hygiene measures.
  4. Incident reporting — Establishing incident reporting structures and processes for timely notification, remediation and continuous improvement of AI systems.
  5. Testing and assurance — Conducting external audits to ensure transparency and build greater credibility and trust with end users; adopting common standards for AI testing to ensure quality and consistency.
  6. Security — Adapting existing frameworks for information security, and developing new testing tools to address new threat vectors to GenAI models.
  7. Content provenance — Increasing transparency of content generation to promote informed consumption of online content for end users (owing to the rapid creation of realistic synthetic content at scale).
  8. Safety and alignment research & development (R&D) — Accelerating investment in R&D to improve safety techniques and evaluation tools to address the potential risks that GenAI may bring.
  9. AI for public good — Increasing accessibility to GenAI by, for example, improving awareness and providing support to drive innovation and AI use among SMEs or partnering with communities with respect to digital literacy initiatives.

These nine dimensions seek to further the core principles of accountability, transparency, fairness, robustness and security. The goal is to develop a trusted AI ecosystem, where AI is harnessed for public good, and people embrace AI safely and confidently.

Public consultation

The IMDA and AI Verify Foundation are welcoming feedback and input to refine the proposed Framework. The consultation is open until 15 March 2024.

* * * * *

If you wish to speak with us on any of the dimensions or issues raised above, please reach out to us.

Relevant links:

Proposed Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AI issued by AI Verify Foundation on 16 January 2024

* * * * *

LOGO_Wong&Leow_Singapore

© 2024 Baker & McKenzie.Wong & Leow. All rights reserved. Baker & McKenzie.Wong & Leow is incorporated with limited liability and is a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International, a global law firm with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a “principal” means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an “office” means an office of any such law firm. This may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Author

Andy Leck is the head of the Intellectual Property and Technology (IPTech) Practice Group and a member of the Dispute Resolution Practice Group in Singapore. He is a core member of Baker McKenzie's regional IP practice and also leads the Myanmar IP Practice Group. Andy is recognised by reputable global industry and legal publications as a leader in his field. He was named on "The A-List: Singapore's Top 100 lawyers" by Asia Business Law Journal 2018. In addition, Chambers Asia Pacific notes that Andy is "a well-known IP practitioner who is highlighted for his record of handling major trade mark litigation, as well as commercial exploitation of IP rights in the media and technology sectors. He's been in the industry for a long time and has always been held in high regard. He is known to be very fair and is someone you would like to be in the trenches with you during negotiations." Furthermore, Asian Legal Business acknowledges Andy as a leading practitioner in his field and notes that he “always gives good, quick advice, [is] client-focused and has strong technical knowledge for his areas of practice.” Andy was appointed by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) as an IP Adjudicator to hear disputes at IPOS for a two-year term from April 2021. He has been an appointed member of the Singapore Copyright Tribunal since May 2010 and a mediator with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center. He is also appointed as a Notary Public & Commissioner for Oaths in Singapore. He previously served on the International Trademark Association’s Board of Directors and was a member of the executive committee.

Author

Ren Jun Lim is a principal with Baker McKenzie Wong & Leow. He represents local and international clients in both contentious and non-contentious intellectual property matters. He also advises on a full range of healthcare, as well as consumer goods-related legal and regulatory issues. Ren Jun co-leads Baker McKenzie Wong & Leow's Healthcare as well as Consumer Goods & Retail industry groups. He sits on the Law Society of Singapore IP Committee and on the Executive Committee of the Association of Information Security Professionals. He is also a member of the Vaccines Working Group, Singapore Association of Pharmaceutical Industries, a member of the International Trademark Association, as well as a member of the Regulatory Affairs Professionals Association. Ren Jun is ranked in the Silver tier for Individuals: Enforcement and Litigation and Individuals: Prosecution and Strategy, and a recommended lawyer for Individuals: Transactions by WTR 1000, 2020. He is also listed in Asia IP's Best 50 IP Expert, 2020, recognised as a Rising Star by Managing IP: IP Stars, 2019 and one of Singapore's 70 most influential lawyers aged 40 and under by Singapore Business Review, 2016. Ren Jun was acknowledged by WTR 1000 as a "trademark connoisseur who boasts supplementary knowledge of regulatory issues in the consumer products industry." He was also commended by clients for being "very responsive to enquiries and with a keen eye for detail, he is extremely hands-on. His meticulous and in-depth approach to strategising is key to the excellent outcomes we enjoy."

Author

Ken Chia is a member of the Firm’s IP Tech, International Commercial & Trade and Competition Practice Groups. He is regularly ranked as a leading TMT and competition lawyer by top legal directories, including Chambers Asia Pacific and Legal 500 Asia Pacific. Ken is an IAPP Certified International Privacy Professional (FIP, CIPP(A), CIPT, CIPM) and a fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and the Singapore Institute of Arbitrators.

Write A Comment