The Corporate Transparency Act requires “reporting companies” to file “beneficial owner” information and “company applicants” with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) as early as 1 January 2025. In a “last minute” 3 December 2024 decision, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Garland, issued an order temporarily enjoining the US government from enforcing the CTA and CTA regulations
US employers can expect material changes to employment laws under the Trump administration, with impacts felt across their business operations. President-elect Trump’s first term, his campaign platform, and the typical shifts in a Democratic to Republican transition provide clues about what’s to come: federal agencies, policies and rules will become more business-centered and many of the Biden-era worker-focused protections will be rolled back.
The IRS recently announced changes to its Form 14457, “Voluntary Disclosure Practice Preclearance and Application,” which allows taxpayers to apply to the IRS in an attempt to limit criminal exposure by disclosing past noncompliance and paying past taxes, interest and penalties. The new form includes several revisions that demonstrate a stricter approach towards taxpayers wanting to voluntarily disclose past tax-related misconduct, including: an admission of willfulness, a more detailed narrative requirement, a shorter time to prepare documents, and mandatory full payment. Taxpayers should consult with counsel to examine any increased risks associated with filing the revised form.
On 16 October 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced its final “Click-to-Cancel” Rule that applies to businesses that offer goods and services through automatically renewing payment plans, free or discounted trials that convert into full plans, or other “negative option features” that interpret a consumer’s silence as permission to keep charging them (collectively, “recurring subscriptions”). Under the finalized rule, the FTC may seek civil penalties of over USD 50,000 per violation, injunctive relief and consumer redress for companies that violate the requirements of having detailed transparent, consent and simple cancellation processes for recurring subscriptions and memberships.
On 12 November 2024, the US Department of Justice Antitrust Division updated its Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs in Criminal Antitrust Investigations (ECCP). The additions include guidance such as using “managers at all levels” to “set the tone from the middle” by “demonstrating to employees the importance of compliance,” establishing policies that account for the use of “ephemeral messaging or non-company methods of communication,” applying “data analytics tools in . . . compliance and monitoring,” and involving compliance personnel in “the deployment of AI and other technologies to assess the risks they may pose.” Additionally, the ECCP now addresses its application to civil investigations.
As AI capabilities and applications continue to advance, the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework has emerged as a vital tool for organizations to responsibly develop and use AI systems.
The Commissioners of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have voted unanimously to issue a final rule developed by both the Antitrust Division of the US Department of Justice and the FTC, updating the Premerger Notification Rules that implement the Hart Scott Rodino Antitrust Improvement Act (“HSR Act”), including substantial changes to the HSR Form.
Tax News and Developments September 2024 In brief Many litigants argue that FBAR penalties, which can exceed the…
On 23 September 2024, the US Department of Justice Criminal Division issued an updated version of its Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs document. DOJ uses the Evaluation Guidance to assess the adequacy of compliance programs in place at companies subject to its criminal enforcement activities. DOJ has updated the Evaluation Guidance periodically since its release in 2017 to align with evolving DOJ policies, priorities, and compliance best practices. This latest iteration reflects current DOJ investigation and enforcement priorities and the increasing relevance of artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies to companies, their compliance programs, and DOJ’s enforcement efforts. DOJ also updated the Evaluation Guidance to encourage companies to: 1) incorporate a lessons-learned approach; 2) focus on compliance due diligence and integration in acquisitions; and 3) properly incentivize internal reporting of wrongdoing.
In recent years, both US state and federal legislatures have intensified efforts to enact laws aimed at safeguarding minors in the digital world. However, several court rulings have found that these legislative actions overstepped constitutional limits. This article highlights key legislative initiatives at the US federal level and in California and Texas to protect children and teenagers online, and lawsuits challenging the legality of the California and Texas measures, as of early September 2024.