The Court of Appeal has held that dismissing an employee for a social media post expressing gender critical beliefs and beliefs on same sex marriage was disproportionate, and therefore discriminatory. This decision confirms the legal tests for balancing conflicting protected beliefs, underscoring the basic principle that employees have the right to manifest their religious or philosophical beliefs, subject only to limited, objectively justifiable exceptions. While the post was arguably offensive to some gay and/or trans people, expressing a protected belief that is offensive to others does not by itself justify disciplinary action; there must be something objectively objectionable in the manner of expression. This is a high threshold; merely “intemperate” language is not sufficient.
A Legal Tightrope for Government Contractors In brief President Trump’s Executive Order 14173 calls for the elimination of…
The Department of Climate Change and Environment (DCCE) launched the second draft of the Climate Change Bill (“Bill”) in November 2024 for a public hearing. Some of the key revisions include provisions similar to the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, adjustments made on the Emissions Trading System (ETS) and carbon tax provisions under the Bill. The Bill is expected to be submitted to Parliament for approval in 2025.
The Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) initiative, led by Japan, offers a significant opportunity for Thailand to advance its decarbonization efforts through financial support for cutting-edge technologies. By participating in JCM projects, Thai companies can obtain financial support from the Japanese government, enhancing efforts towards implementing effective greenhouse gas mitigation and removal measures, which in turn aids in achieving Thailand’s declared GHG reduction targets.
The European Commission’s Competitiveness Compass was published on 29 January 2025. It sets forth the European Commission’s priorities for the next five years with a clear ambition to make Europe a leader in future technologies, services, and clean products. The policy priorities are defined around three pillars: (i) Innovation, (ii) Decarbonization and (iii) Security.
In the first two days of his presidency, President Trump signed a series of executive orders aimed at dismantling diversity programs across the federal government, revoking longstanding DEI and affirmative action requirements for federal contractors, and directing public and private entities to end policies that constitute “illegal DEI discrimination”.
President Trump has taken quick action to ramp up immigration enforcement in his first days in office. While Trump’s early focus on deportations and border security is not new, the swift and aggressive enforcement approach represents a significant change as compared to prior administrations. These actions have led to arrests and heightened concerns among employers and employees alike.
In brief
The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) introduced the Maintenance of Racial Harmony Bill (“Bill”) and the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore (Amendment) Bill in Parliament for First Reading on 7 January 2025.
The Bill introduces specific legislation on racial harmony and consolidates the government’s existing powers to deal with racial issues and threats to racial harmony, including a Restraining Order (RO) regime to deal with content prejudicial to racial harmony.
In more detail
Background
The Bill takes close reference from the existing Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act (MRHA) and the Penal Code.
The key proposals in the Bill are closely aligned with those in the MRHA and include the introduction of the following: (1) an RO regime to target content prejudicial to racial harmony in Singapore; (2) a community-based approach to managing racial incidents; and (3) safeguards to prevent designated race-based entities from being used as vectors of foreign influence.
The Bill also consolidates Penal Code offences relating to race (e.g. inciting feelings of enmity, hatred, ill-will or hostility against a racial group; inciting violence on the basis of race, or against a racial group). The Bill will also contain provisions that apply even if the offending conduct occurs or threats originate from overseas (e.g. via social media), as long as the offence was directed towards a person or group in Singapore.
Restriction orders
Similar to the existing RO scheme under the MRHA, the proposed Bill enables the Minister of Home Affairs to issue ROs against persons involved in the communication, production or distribution of content that prejudices the maintenance of religious harmony in Singapore.
A racial content RO under the Bill may do the following:
Prohibit a person from communicating or distributing specified information or material;
Prohibit a person from addressing a specified audience on a specified subject;
Require a person to take all reasonably practicable steps to ensure that any specified information or material is no longer available to the general public in Singapore;
Prohibit a person from printing, editing, assisting, or contributing to a specified publication; and
Prohibit a person from holding office in an editorial board or a committee of a specified publication.
The RO takes immediate effect once issued. There will be safeguards in place for the issuance of ROs — all ROs will be reviewed by the new Presidential Council for Racial and Religious Harmony (PCRRH) (replacing the Presidential Council for Religious Harmony established under the MRHA) and are subject to confirmation by the President. Persons issued an RO will also be able to make representations to the PCRRH.
Safeguards against foreign influence
The Bill also introduces safeguards against external actors exerting malicious foreign influence to undermine racial harmony.
The safeguards will apply to designated race-based entities. An entity may be designated if the Competent Authority is satisfied that:
Its primary or other objects, purposes or activities includes representing or promoting the interests of, or discussing any issue relating to, any race; and
Designation is deemed necessary or expedient to pre-empt, prevent or reduce any foreign influence that may undermine racial harmony in Singapore.
Examples of designated entities include clan and business associations linked to the Chinese, Malay and Indian races.
These entities will be notified of the Competent Authority’s intent to designate them, and can submit representations as to why they need not be designated before a final decision is reached. Designated race-based entities may also apply to the Minister for Home Affairs for exemptions from some or all obligations under the Bill.
Designated race-based entities will be subject to reporting and governance obligations, including the following:
Requirements to disclose: (i) foreign and anonymous donations accepted; (ii) foreign affiliations; and (iii) their leadership composition
Requirements to comply with leadership restrictions, to ensure that: (i) more than half of the entity’s governing body comprises of Singapore citizens; and (ii) the responsible officers of the entity are Singapore citizens or permanent residents
The Minister for Home Affairs will also have powers to impose stepped-up measures against specific race-based entities through the issuance of foreign influence ROs. Such ROs can:
Prohibit an entity from accepting donations from a specified foreign principal, or any anonymous donation;
Require an entity to return or dispose of any donation from a specified foreign principal, or any anonymous donation;
Prohibit an entity from forming or maintaining an affiliation with a foreign principal; and/or
Prohibit an entity from appointing or retaining any individual as a member of its governing body.
Key takeaways
The Bill is part of the MHA’s and the government’s broader efforts to strengthen racial cohesion and promote racial harmony in Singapore.
Further information is available on the MHA’s website.
For further information and to discuss what this development might mean for you, please get in touch with your usual Baker McKenzie contact.
* * * * *
LOGO_Wong&Leow_Singapore
© 2025 Baker & McKenzie. Wong & Leow. All rights reserved. Baker & McKenzie. Wong & Leow is incorporated with limited liability and is a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International, a global law firm with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a “principal” means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an “office” means an office of any such law firm. This may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
On 4 December 2024, the Federal Cabinet adopted the comprehensive German National Circular Economy Strategy (NCES). The NCES bundles all of Germany’s goals and measures on the path to a holistic circular economy with the “Circularity Made in Germany” seal. The implementation of the NCES includes the following: The establishment of a circular economy platform involving all stakeholders; the development of a Roadmap 2030 to concretize the goals and measures formulated in the NCES; the establishment of a monitoring and evaluation system as well as resolutions on financing. The initiative offers numerous opportunities for companies to make their business models and production processes more sustainable.
On 23 December 2024, Canada’s Competition Bureau published draft guidelines concerning environmental claims and compliance with the Competition Act (the “Act”) for public consultation. Updated guidance on environmental claims has been much anticipated following recent amendments to the Act that explicitly prohibit greenwashing as a form of deceptive marketing.